Home ] BIODATA ] Interests ] Photo Album ] Favorites ] Miscellaneous ]

 

INTRODUCTORY NOTE ON HIGHWAYS RELATED ACTIVITIES AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTWARE AND NETWORKING

 

1. introduction:

1.1             Ministry of Surface Transport(MOST) consists of two departments viz. Department of Shipping & Department of Road Transport & Highways.

 

1.2             Department of Road Transport and Highways is responsible for development, construction and maintenance of National Highways(NH) and Highway Research.  Construction and maintenance of National Highways is the major responsibility of this department.  These activities are carried out by this Ministry with the help of State Govt. and autonomous organisations such as National Highway Authority of India (NHAI).  Organizational Chart of administrative control of Deptt. of Road Transport and Highways is presented in the form of Annexure-I. 

 

1.3             National Highway related activities are governed by National Highway Act, 1956.  According to which, it is the responsibility of Govt. of India to construct and maintain National Highways.  However, this activity may be carried out with the help of agencies as per Section 3 of this Act.  Accordingly, this work is assigned to State Public Works Departments (PWDs) for the part of National Highway falling under the boundaries of respective states.  Govt. of India (MOST) is primarily making policy related to National Highways and monitoring the construction and maintenance of National Highways.  To carry out this activity, there is an office of Director General-Roads [DG (Roads)], headed by cadre controlling authority of Highway engineers who is responsible to provide all kinds of technical inputs required in the field of Highway construction and maintenance.  Technical feasibility of the project is primarily ascertained and approved by O/o DG (Roads) whereas financial feasibility is ascertained by Internal Financial Advisor (IFA).  Approvals are done in accordance with Delegation of Financial Power Rules (DFPRs) and General Financial Rules (GFRs).  Once the project is found to be feasible and viable; technical, administrative and financial sanction is accorded by MOST and communication to this effect is made to respective State Govt./UTs and all concerned.

 

1.4             Any Highway related project is prepared by concerned State / Union Territory PWD and submitted to MOST.  O/o DG (Road) does technical evaluation of the project.  Financial analysis of the same is carried out by IFA.  Ministry, then, issues sanction to respective offices / organisations.  Once these sanctions reach concerned State / UT PWD, work is started by them and expenditure is incurred out of their own funds (On Account Payment is released to State Govt. / UT to provide them leverage to incur such expenditure). After exercising all the checks, claims are raised with concerned Pay & Accounts Officer (PAO) working under Chief Controller of Accounts (CCA), MOST.  These claims are submitted by State Accountant General (AG) after compiling the monthly account received from concerned PWDs.  PAO exercises all prescribed checks in accordance with the approved procedure of 1977 (as approved by Controller General of Accounts (CGA) and Comptroller and Auditor General of India(C&AG)) and orders and instructions issued by O/o CCA and MOST from time to time.  Flow chart of these activities is appended as Annexure II.

 

1.5       In the existing Payment Procedure, work was being executed by State PWD, out of its own funds.  In several State Govts., there is a severe crunch of availability of resources which has adversely affected the execution of NH related works.  In several cases, it has been observed that even the On Account Payment released to State Govt. is diverted for other purposes.  Over and above these drawbacks, existing procedure allows reimbursement only after the lapse of three months.  Therefore, the entire cycle of payment and execution is delayed.  To solve all these problems, Direct Payment Procedure has been attempted whereby payments will be made directly by MOST, Govt. of India.

 

1.6             Direct Payment Procedure has been tried in Punjab during 1999-2000 for Externally Aided Schemes and similar procedure was followed in 8 States during January to March 2000 for Special Repair programmes.  Now, with the approval of CGA and C&AG, it is intended to implement a revamped Direct Payment Procedure in 14 States after completion of necessary formalities. This procedure is likely to be implemented through out India in due course. Procedure as approved by CGA and C&AG is appended as Annexure III.  In this procedure stage of project approval will remain unchanged whereas payment to State PWD will not be made in the form of reimbursement, rather, it will be paid directly to them.  Therefore, State PWD will get the work executed / will execute the work and prefer the bill to Drawing and Disbursing Officer (DDO) of MOST. Regional Officer (RO) will act as DDO. He will submit the bill to Regional PAO (RPAO) for payment.  Payment will be released by RPAO and parties concerned will get the due payment through State PWD.  Therefore, in this procedure, no fund is required to be available with State PWD for the execution of National Highway related projects.  A manual has been devised delineating the responsibility of DDO, RPAO and State PWD along with the registers and forms required to be maintained / filled by them.  It is appended as Annexure IV.

 

1.7             Currently National Highway related projects are approved, sanctions are issued and payments are released manually.  There is no automation done for these activities in any of the activity centers.  Some minor Work is done in an independent from in Excel or Word.   There is no structured database available.  Only data base which is available in the O/o CCA is of the details of payments made head-wise which contains compiled information of all head of accounts of Ministry of Surface Transport.  Hence, whatever database or system available may be practically considered as irrelevant for NH works.

 

 

2. REQUIREMENTS:

           

2.1             It has been observed that in this entire process, there are several redundant activities, which are not only time consuming but also result in Duplicacy of work. In order to make the process of approval of project, monitoring thereof, release of funds and accounting and budgetary control more effective, it is necessary to have a centralised database and networking between all the centers of activities. It needs no emphasis that activities carried out by this office and various other offices requires to be streamlined and automated to the most feasible extent. Enormous data is available in our offices without any linkages. Data management is done manually; hence advantages of correlation between data are not derived. In an automated environment several manual records may be dispensed with as similar records are being maintained separately by different wings of MOST.

 

2.2             It is evident that there are 6 major centers of activities under Govt. of India in the system of project approval and payment etc. of National Highway.  These are O/o DG (Road), Deptt. of RT&H, IFA, O/o CCA, PAO and DDO (RO). Activity centers are located in New Delhi and major state capitals.  It is proposed to have a network connecting all the 6 above-mentioned activity centers with two centralised database located at Delhi. One database will be available in the server of Parivahan Bhawan, MOST (New Delhi).  Whereas another database will be available in the O/o CCA at Jam Nagar House, New Delhi.  Both the database may be inter-related and data may be inter-changed within the defined parameters.  Cases of project approval will move through computers and movement of paper will not be necessary.  All related data required to be captured from the project reports submitted by State PWD will be captured centrally in Delhi.  This data will contain entire technical detail of National Highway including approved rates, quantity and quality as per various schedules of PWD as adopted by MOST.  Modules related to financial analysis will facilitate financial appraisal of the projects. Therefore, entire project may be done without involving any paper work.  Hence, office may be turned into a paper less office. 

 

2.3             In the case of existing payment procedure, claims received from O/o AG in the form of monthly accounts will be the source of input in the O/o PAO.  All relevant data will be captured locally in the O/o RPAOs and after doing necessary checking, payment will be released by PAO to State AG.

                                                                                             

2.4             In the case of direct payment procedure, bills will be received by RO and all the relevant records will be entered locally in the O/o RO.  Data so entered will get compared with the approved data, which is already available in the server of MOST.  This comparison will ensure that no excess is allowed either in the budget or in the materials.  This activity may be carried out without intervention of human beings.  RO will scrutinise the bills and forward them to RPAO for payment.  Relevant data will be captured in the O/o RPAO and pre-check will be done before releasing payment.  There again, all the standard and low level decision making activities may be carried out in an automated environment.

 

2.5             In order to facilitate development of the new system, it is essential to conduct a Software Requirements Study (SRS).

 

2.6             Its purpose will be to systemically describe the S/W requirement and provide information required for fulfilling accounting, monitoring and NH project related information needs of MOST.

 

2.7             This document should serve as a reference for design, development and implementation of application S/W for MOST.  It should also serve as a basis for estimating the effort involved in the complete computerization of all the accounting and other activities of MOST (related to Roads and Highways).

 

2.8             It should describe the functional requirements, external interfaces, inputs and outputs of the system, flow of data, identified entities and attributes.

 

3. INPUTS:  

 

3.1             Following documents would be made available to firms in order to have better understanding about Ministry and system being followed in National Highway related works and accounts.

 

(i)                 Annual Report of Ministry.

(ii)               Relevant pages of Accounts at a Glance.

(iii)             Accounting procedure of 1977.

(iv)              Direct Payment Procedure.

(v)                Manual of Direct Payment procedure.

(vi)              Copy of sample sanctions.

 

3.2             Further clarification on requirements etc. would be done on 24th, 25th and 27th Nov. 2000. Firms may seek clarification in writing or in person the same day.

 

3.3             Once contract is awarded firms may have access to other official documents and may interview the concerned and mutually agreed officers other than the designated co-ordination officers for this purpose.

 

4.                  OUTPUT

 

4.1       Software Requirements Study Report conforming to IEEE 830-1993 or 1998 has to be submitted within the agreed time schedule.

 

 

Home ] BIODATA ] Interests ] Photo Album ] Favorites ] Miscellaneous ]